University of Auckland, “Naming ” ©201
Passage 1 is adapted from The University of Auckland,
“Naming Species before Extinction.” ©2013 by The
University of Auckland. Passage 2 is adapted from Geoffrey
Giller, “Are We Any Closer to Knowing How Many Species
There Are on Earth?” ©2014 by Scientific American, a
division of Nature America, Inc.
Passage 1
Claims that most species will go extinct before
they can be discovered have been debunked by
researchers in an article published in Science.
The scientists show that the claims are based on
two key misconceptions: an over-estimation of how
many species may exist on Earth, and the erroneous
belief that the number of taxonomists (people who
describe and identify species) is declining.
“Our findings are potentially good news for
the conservation of global biodiversity,” says lead
author Associate Professor Mark Costello from The
University of Auckland, who published the work
with Professor Nigel Stork from Griffith University
and Professor Bob May from Oxford.
The authors propose that there are 5, plus or
minus 3, million species on Earth—far fewer than
has been widely believed—of which 1.5 million
species have been named. This re-affirms previous
estimates by the three authors, which spanned the
upper and lower reaches of this range.
“Over-estimates of the number of species on
Earth are self-defeating because they can make
attempts to discover and conserve biodiversity
appear to be hopeless,” says Dr. Costello. “Our work
suggests that this is far from the case. We believe that
with just a modest increase in effort in taxonomy and
conservation, most species could be discovered and
protected from extinction.”
The authors conclude that there have never been
so many people describing new species—including
professionals and amateurs, the number may
near 50,000. And the community continues to grow,
in large part due to the development of science in
Asia and South America, regions that are rich in
biodiversity and where many new species are being
discovered.
While the research suggests that species are more
likely to be discovered than to go extinct, the authors
do not underplay the seriousness of the threats to
species and their habitats. The combination of
over-hunting, habitat loss and climate change, now
occurring at both local and global scales, means that
extinction rates could increase very rapidly in the
future.
Dr. Costello says that the discovery and naming
of species is critical to their conservation. Naming a
species gives formal recognition to its existence,
making its conservation far easier.
Passage 2
Julian Caley, a researcher at the Australian
Institute of Marine Science, and his coauthors looked
at published estimates of the total number of species
in the world as well as reckonings of the number of
terrestrial insects, terrestrial arthropods, marine
species and coral reef–dwelling species. Within each
group, the researchers found that there was no
indication that the estimates were converging on a
number or a range.
The main problem, Caley says, is that new
estimates usually fail to take previous work into
account. “No one really refers to the information
that’s already gained,” he says. Caley also points out
that many of these past estimates used multiple
different techniques to arrive at their estimates,
including extrapolations based on the density of
species in a study area or the rate at which new
species are being discovered and described. But a
larger problem is that many are just single-number
estimates. Normally, he explains, statistical
calculations have an associated margin of error. This
range incorporates the likelihood that the actual
number of species is not, say, five million—it could
be five million plus or minus three million, for a total
range of two million to eight million species globally.
(This was, in fact, the estimate of one paper that
included a range.)
The team calls for future estimates to include
these ranges and to be statistically based, instead of
what they call “simple best guesses.” When taking
past work into account, the authors wrote, estimates
that are not statistically based should carry less
weight or possibly be excluded altogether.
Nigel Stork, a professor at Griffith University, is a
coauthor of the paper that gave the two million to
eight million species range. Stork agrees about the
need for improved statistical approaches when
making estimates. He takes issue, however, with
Caley’s conclusion that there is no convergence of
global species estimates. “[Caley] says that the global
تعليقات
إرسال تعليق